In the Middle Ages, most people lived in villages and worked as agricultural laborers, or peasants. Every village had a “lord,” and peasants worked on his land. Much of what they produced went to the lord and his family. What little food was leftover went to support the peasants’ families. In return for their labor, the lord offered them protection. A peasant’s day usually began before sunrise and involved long hours of backbreaking work, which included plowing the land, planting seeds, and cutting the crops for harvesting. The working life of a peasant in the Middle Ages was usually demanded and exhausting.
When Phil Davison said "use it not only as a tool, but as a weapon," he violated which guideline of proactive speech delivery as he did everything opposite to the guidelines of a proactive speech rules.
Because these are the rules apply to proactive speech, the speech should be meaningful and your voice should be expressive. Reduce the number of pauses while delivering the speech like ums, uhs, likes, and y'knows. Spell words out loudly. Don't murmur or mispronounce them.
Use the proper volume and pace when speaking. Consider the topic, location, and audience. To make your point clearer and keep the audience's attention, vary your voice's pace, intonation, and power. But what Phil Davison did was Despite possessing a master's in communication, things just get worse from there.
His voice starts to grow, but not in the positive way we talked about in class. Davison starts shouting at the top of his lungs one minute and twenty-five seconds into the speech. If frightening the audience by screaming at them qualifies as pathos, Davison is making the most of pathos. I was unable to discover how Davison used pathos in any other way. And he did everything against the guidelines of proactive speech.
To know more about speech:
brainly.com/question/3743745
#SPJ4
Answer:
Pets can improve your life. The ability of animalsin helping people recover from a range of health and emotional problems has long been scientifically recognized. Now, a survey reported in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology appears to show that owning a pet can help healthy individuals too. A number of experiments, carried out by two universities in the United States, indicate that pet owners are generally happier, healthier, fitter, more confident and better able to cope with everyday issues than non-owners. The researchers discovered that individuals have just as close a relationship with the key people in their lives, in other words, family and friends, as they have with their pets. And although they found no evidence that people choose emotional relationships with pets over relationships with other people, a study of university students showed that owning a pet helped them get over the break-up of a relationship with a partner.
Explanation:
The text shown above had the blanks completed with the words that best fit the text, in order to maintain the context of the message presented and providing a coherent, cohesive and meaningful text.
The text above addresses the benefits that people can have when they own a pet. The text states that these benefits were scientifically proven through scientific research carried out by different universities, where all had the same result, proving the veracity of the information.
<span>Sarah's hands were cold and clammy.
This sentence does not contain a pronoun. </span>
