1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luba_88 [7]
3 years ago
11

There are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include: Rodeos, Horse racing, Circ

uses, Hunting, Animal research, as well as companies that raise animals for meat of their byproducts. Do you think that any or all of these industries are morally wrong? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
garri49 [273]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

No, I don't think that any of these industries are morally wrong?

As the passage in the Bible says: "the one who is not guilty of nothing can throw the first rock," which menas that nobody has granted us the right to judge.

It is true that there are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include rodeos, horse racing, circuses, hunting,

Many of these companies do not have the proper facilities or the proper care for animals. But that is not the case of all.

Although this is a controversial issue, some of these companies take care of animals and employ hundreds of people that support their families and pay taxes. Furthermore, they fulfill an important function in the entertainment industry.

So my suggestion would be that federal and state regulations could be more strict to protect animals, by closing those industries is not the better option.

You might be interested in
Match each country with the country that controlled it. Answers may be used once, more than once, or not at all.
Andrej [43]
<span>India and Burma hope this help

</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Plllllllllllsssss someone HELLLLLPPPP... Its very urgent
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

The North American Free Trade Agreement created the world's largest free trade area, covering the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In 2017, its member economies generated approximately $22.2 trillion in gross domestic product. NAFTA is also controversial. Politicians don't agree on whether the free trade agreement's advantages outweigh its disadvantages. Here they are so you can decide for yourself.

Pros

NAFTA has six main advantages. According to a Congressional Research Service report prepared in 2017, the act has more than tripled trade between Canada, Mexico, and the United States since it was enacted.1  The agreement reduced and eliminated tariffs. Second, greater trade increased economic output. While it is challenging to weigh the impact of NAFTA given the variety of factors involved, experts estimated that full NAFTA implementation would U.S. growth by as much as 0.5% a year.2  Third, while there are varying estimates, stronger growth created jobs. According to a 2010 report, U.S. free trade agreements – the lion's share of which stemmed from the NAFTA agreement – directly supported 5.4 million jobs, while trade with these countries supported 17.7 million.3   Fourth, foreign direct investment (FDI) more than tripled. The United States increased FDI in Mexico from $15.2 billion in 1993 to $104.4 billion in 2012, and from $69.9 billion in Canada in 1993 to $352.9 billion in 2015. Mexico ramped up investment in the United States by 1283% over the same time period, while Canada's FDI increased by 911%. Fifth, NAFTA lowered prices. U.S. oil imports from Mexico cost less because NAFTA got rid of tariffs. That reduces America's reliance on oil from the Middle East. Low-cost oil reduces gas prices, which reduces transportation cost. Food prices are lower in turn. 4  Sixth, the agreement helped with government spending. Each nation's government contracts became available to suppliers in all three member countries. That increased competition and lowered costs.

Cons

NAFTA has six main disadvantages. First, certain estimates indicate that it led to job losses. A 2011 report from the Economic Policy Institute estimated a loss of 682,900 jobs.5  Other estimates estimate a loss of 500,000-750,000 U.S. jobs. Most were in the manufacturing industries in California, New York, Michigan, and Texas. Though the estimated job gains exceed those lost, certain industries were particularly impacted, including manufacturing, automotive, textile, computer, and electrical appliance industries. Second, job migration suppressed wages. Companies threatened to move to Mexico to keep workers from joining unions.6  Without the unions, workers could not bargain for better wages. This strategy was so successful that it became standard operating procedure. Between 1993 and 1995, half of all companies used it. By 1999, that rate had grown to 65%. Third, NAFTA put Mexican farmers out of business. It allowed U.S. government-subsidized farm products into Mexico. Local farmers could not compete with the subsidized prices. As a result, 1.3 million farmers were put out of business, according to the Economic Policy Institute.7  It forced unemployed farmers to cross the border illegally to find work. In 1995, there were 2.9 million Mexicans living in the United States illegally. It increased to 4.5 million in 2000, probably due to NAFTA.8  The recession drove that figure to 6.9 million in 2007. In 2014, it fell to 5.8 million, roughly double where it was before NAFTA. Fourth, unemployed Mexican farmers went to work in substandard conditions in the maquiladora program. Maquiladora is where United States-owned companies employ Mexican workers near the border. They cheaply assemble products for export back into the United States. Employment in maquiladoras rose 120,000 in 1980 to 1.2 million in 2006.9   Fifth, U.S. companies degraded the Mexican environment to keep costs low. Agribusiness in Mexico used more fertilizers and other chemicals, resulting in increased pollution.10  Rural farmers were forced into marginal land to stay in business, resulting in increased deforestation rates.11  That deforestation contributes to global warming. Sixth, NAFTA allowed Mexican trucks access into the United States. Mexican trucks are not held to the same safety standards as American trucks. Congress never allowed this provision to go into effect.

USMCA

Despite these advantages, the United States, Mexico, and Canada renegotiated NAFTA on September 30, 2018. The new deal is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. It must be ratified by each country's legislature. Trump has called for Congress to ratify it within six months.14  If not ratified, it the U.S. will revert to pre-NAFTA trade conditions. If ratified, it will go into effect in 2020. The Trump administration renegotiated with the aim of lowering the trade deficit between the United States and Mexico.15  The new deal changes NAFTA in six major areas.16  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
This virginia colonist is credited with successfully cultivating a popular new strain of tobacco which became the cash crop that
prohojiy [21]
John Rolfe is the answer! :)
7 0
3 years ago
What is the name of the battle that kicked off the american revolution?
Umnica [9.8K]
The battle at Lexington
6 0
3 years ago
Pls help ill mark brainliest List three aspects of Christianity that people of the Roman Empire might have found attractive.
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

1. Being forgiven with no punishment

2. Helping others

3. Being there for others

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The separation of church and state was important to the French people because of the power and wealth held by the clergy. Which
    8·2 answers
  • How did governments change as a result of World War I ?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the first president Of the United States?
    5·1 answer
  • What was life in new york back then
    15·2 answers
  • Great Britain and the American colonies were interdependent. Which of the following is an example of a good which contributed to
    6·1 answer
  • How does the federal government pay for itself
    12·1 answer
  • Who does the digging and excavations now
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was central to maintaining and expanding all three Islamic empires? A. Centrally located capitals B. Isla
    11·1 answer
  • How did migration to the Western Territory help to develop the United States?
    10·2 answers
  • Imagine that you live in a centrally planned or command economy. What aspect would you like most about living in this type of ec
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!