Answer:
girl why is you typing in caps in my question
Explanation:
I believe it is A) Input because input costs means the cost of direct material, direct labor, and other overhead items devoted to the production of a good or service.
Answer:
The correct option is B, the profits of copper produces increase
Explanation:
Assuming copper is price inelastic, meaning the rise in price would not impact the quantity demanded significantly, the revenue of the suppliers increase and as a result the bottom-line( profits) recorded by the suppliers increase.
A price increase cannot bring about reduction in quantity supplied ads increase in price is an incentive to supply more, hence option A is wrong.
Option C is totally out of context as well as option D
The government is not the one producing the copper let alone increase the content of the copper
Answer:
The executive and judicial branch I’m pretty sure
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
