1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
15

How do employers generally respond to poor economic times? A. Raising the prices of goods to make back money B. Lowering the pri

ce of goods so people will buy C. Higher more people at low wages D. Cutting workers’ wages to make up for losses
History
1 answer:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D. Cutting workers' wages to make up for losses

Explanation:

During poor economic times, many companies often struggle with how best to manage their most valuable resource - their human resource while remaining viable or relevant as a business. This means that employers would do everything possible to retain their employees even if it will involve cutting their wages rather than laying them off.

Most companies during tough economic times adopts strategy to cut workers' wages inorder to make up for losses. Here, companies cut costs and adapt to changing market demand. In as much as the poor economic times affects most if not all companies, most employees would also be willing to accept pay cut rather than being laid off.

You might be interested in
India both benefited from and was harmed by British colonial
Blizzard [7]

The positive impact of British colonialism in India is related to democracy in the country, which was instituted through British investment in Indian institutions such as courts and universities.

The negative impacts are related to the use of violence by British colonists throughout colonization.

<h3>British India</h3>

It corresponds to the period from 1757 to 1857, in which India was dominated by the British empire, which established colonialism in the country by establishing trading posts and exploiting resources.

Therefore, the positive and negative impacts of colonialism in India are related to the governance system of the British, which despite instituting democratic systems, also used violence and war to increase its control.

Find out more information about British India here:

brainly.com/question/873957

4 0
2 years ago
Were the changes that resulted from the women's movement mostly positive or mostly negative? What changes still need to take pla
svetoff [14.1K]
Mostly positive, women's involvement in politics was demanded to establish equality.
7 0
3 years ago
What was true of most prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups?
Burka [1]

Answer:

They made tools from stone

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is a level of government that has jurisdiction over a single population center?
saul85 [17]

municipal/ u could use google to find def. real quick

7 0
3 years ago
MARKING BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT, NO ABSURD ANSWERS!
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

D.) a low infant mortality rate.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the founder of ancient India??
    8·1 answer
  • African primary traded with what merchants along trans-saharan trade routes
    11·1 answer
  • What make a source credible
    10·2 answers
  • Roosevelt, the clayton antitrust act, and the federal trade commission kept unions under control.
    10·1 answer
  • President bill clinton was impeached by the house of congress in 1998 on what charge
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you think protestors were successful in Birmingham
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a belief held by Progressive reformers? End of exam A. Big businesses should be regulated by governme
    12·1 answer
  • The articles of confederation were important mainly because they....
    5·2 answers
  • BRAINLIESTTTT ASAP~!
    11·2 answers
  • Which side in the war does Roosevelt want to win? Why?!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!