No.... thx for the points..... k bye
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GREEN BOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Answer: uh what paragraph ?
Explanation:
Answer:
Raven as a child is an important character because he creates light. - a connection back to the point Therefore, both myths show that their cultures may have valued children. - a concluding statement The Haida myth uses Raven, who takes the shape of a baby - a connection back to the point This shows the Haida myth largely depends on the work of a child. - the analysis of the evidence
Explanation:
An "analysis of evidence" is a sentence that analyzes a sentence that provides support for the general theme of the text. Literally, this type of phrase analyzes to show the sentences that were constructed as evidence.
A "connection back to the point" is a phrase that makes a reference or that returns to a previously specified or informed theme.
A "concluding statement" is a phrase that provides the conclusion of the entire text. This type of phrase usually starts with words like "however", "potanto", "especially", among others.
I apologize, I'm just going to write the correct answer for each, not the whole sentence.
1. So that
2. To
3. In order to
4. So as to
5. So that
6. To
7. So that
8. To
9. So that
10. So that
I apologize again for not writing out the entire sentences with the correct answers in each.
