1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luda [366]
3 years ago
5

Anyone want to be mutals? if you then add me b4 brainly takes this down :sob: UWU

Social Studies
1 answer:
Effectus [21]3 years ago
3 0
No im fine , need more points
You might be interested in
Ethnocentrism ________.
stealth61 [152]

Answer:

The answer is d.Allof the above.

Explanation:

Ethnocentrism which can also be referred to as tribalism is the belief that one's culture and values are superior to others. It causes us to judge others based on our own values and it is inherent in all cultures.

3 0
3 years ago
Write about the Pros of Indian Judiciary system (for a debate)? (urgent pls)
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The collegium system must not see itself as being above the safeguards and measures for transparency, accountability and demographic representation that apply to India’s pillars of democracy.

In September 2019, Chief Justice of Madras High Court Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani resigned after the collegium upheld their decision to transfer her to the high court of Meghalaya (one of the smallest in the country). Justice Tahilramani was the senior-most high-court judge in the country. The members of the bar associations across Tamil Nadu protested against this move and carried “a one-day court boycott.” In addition, in Maharashtra's Latur, about 2,000 lawyers boycotted court proceedings to protest the transfer. The collegium responded by saying that they have “cogent reasons” for the transfer, and will reveal them if required.

At the heart of this controversy is the functioning of the collegium system, which makes decisions about appointments and transfers in the higher judiciary. In February 2020, former Supreme Court judge and member of the collegium from 2018–2019, Arjan Kumar Sikri, said that far from a “scientific study” about candidates, “most times, we [the collegium] go by “our impression” when appointing judges [to high courts and the Supreme Court].”

The collegium system is headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. India’s Constitution originally stipulated that the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts would be appointed by the President based on a process of “consultation” with senior judges. The present collegium system emerged later based on three key rulings. In 1981, the “First Judges Case” ruled that the process of consultation with the CJI and other judges did not require a consensus about recommendations. Essentially, the ruling gave the central government “primacy in judicial appointments.” In 1993, the “Second Judges Case” overturned this decision and introduced the collegium system, arguing that “consultation” required “concurrence.” Specifically, the ruling said that the process of appointing judges would be based on “an institutional opinion formed in consultation with the two senior-most judges in the Supreme Court” and the CJI. In 1998, the “Third Judges Case” ruled that the collegium would be a five-member body, establishing the system that is most similar to the one currently being followed.

This reading list details how the current system can be reformed.

Opaque and Unaccountable System

C Raj Kumar writes that the lack of information about the appointment of judges, including the criteria based on which the judges make their choice, is “the most persuasive criticism of the collegium system.”

   Without a transparent process of the appointment of judges, the collegium system will not have the credibility and the legitimacy for it to be accepted by all stakeholders within the legal system. Transparency will not be established merely by stating that the members of the collegium will act in a transparent manner. It will have to be demonstrated by the process that the judiciary adopts in the selection of judges.

The lack of transparency and the absence of formal criteria have multiple worrying implications. Presently, there is no structured process to investigate if a judge who is recommended by the collegium has any conflict of interests. This is important in the context where the

   … collegium has been fraught with serious allegations of different types of alleged conflict of interest among the members of the collegium and the individuals they have selected to become judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. There is an urgent need for the collegium to formulate a detailed set of rules and regulations that will govern the determination of conflict of interest among the members of the collegium who are involved in the selection of judges.

Social Background of Judges  

Alok Prasanna Kumar identifies that the collegium system prefers practising lawyers rather than appointing and promoting “judges of the subordinate judiciary,” which often comprises a diverse pool of candidates.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chances of death or injury at low speeds when the driver is unbelted are the same as those for belted drivers.
EastWind [94]
This is most definitely FALSE
4 0
3 years ago
I REALLY need the answer QUICKLY
baherus [9]

Answer:

answer is A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why were protests against the stamp act effective in persuading british merchants to oppose the tax?
patriot [66]

The protests against the stamp act effective in persuading British merchants to oppose the tax are because the boycotts by the Daughters of Liberty hurt businesses back in Britain.

The act required the colonists to pay a tax, represented by way of a stamp, on diverse kinds of papers, documents, and playing cards. It was an instantaneous tax imposed via the British authorities without the approval of the colonial legislatures and become payable in difficult-to-obtain British sterling, in place of colonial forex.

The Stamp Act of 1765 was an act of the Parliament of high-quality Britain which imposed a direct tax on the British colonies in the united states and required that many revealed substances inside the colonies be produced on stamped paper produced in London, carrying an embossed sales stamp.

On March 22, 1765, British Parliament sooner or later exceeded the Stamp Act or responsibilities in American Colonies Act. It required colonists to pay taxes on each page of printed paper they used. The tax also protected charges for playing cards, dice, and newspapers. The response within the colonies become immediately.

Learn  more about the Stamp act here brainly.com/question/17635338

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Two activists who filmed undercover videos of planned parenthood charged with 15 felonies
    12·1 answer
  • In a critical path analysis, the shortest path is what drives the completion date for the project. True False
    5·1 answer
  • Functional structures tend to be effective when an organization has a large number of products and services requiring special at
    5·1 answer
  • How have diamonds contributed<br> to civil wars and unrest?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the British army defeated in the American Revolution? Answers: 1. The British had to ship supplies across the ocean 2. A
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Washington warn against divided political parties? HELPPPPP ASAPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • How is a block mountain formed?​
    6·2 answers
  • Rope, wedge, and stovepipe are all varieties of what?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the difference between market and command economies
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the second largest destination and market country in the world for women and children trafficked by the sex industry?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!