Macbeth had several impediments to assassinate Duncan, King of Scotland. The double trust he would be braking is that first he considered the King Duncan as his "kinsman and his subject" so he had to protect him. Second, Macbeth was hosting Duncan in his castle so he had to keep it away from any threat as an implicit compromise instead of being himself the killer. In addition, Macbeth thought that King Duncan was a noble, virtuous and free of corruption person, so his dead would make people feel very sad which filled Macbeth with a lot of guilt even though ambition made him doubt.
Literally just paste each question into www.Bing.com
The approach applied by William James emphasizes the mind and behavior-related functions and purposes in adapting to the concerned environment and is considered a <u>functionalism approach.</u>
<h3>What is meant by psychology?</h3>
Psychology is the study applied by professional experts who analyze the mindset and behavior of a human being.
The functionalism approach is one of the concepts of psychology where the mind and behavior of a human being adaptive to the challenges and opportunities in the environment. It entirely relates to the mental state which depends on its function and motive.
Therefore, the provided situation describes the concept of the functionalism approach to psychology.
Learn more about the psychology in the related link:
brainly.com/question/4224754
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": community and personal valor.
Explanation:
Native Americans is a term referred to the tribes living in what today is the U.S. and Canada before English settlers invaded the continent and occupied their territories mostly by force thanks to the use of firearms. When it comes to religion and values, different native American tribes had different beliefs but all of them had in common the importance of keeping their lands for their communities' wellness.
<em>Native Americans placed especial value in equality and acceptance of all people. They did not use to value each other for what they had but for what they were.</em>
