Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answers:
Bekka read <em>"Someone to Love Me"</em> for her book report.
Keisha invited her friends to a pool party for her birthday.
Did she name the kitten Sunshine because of its golden fur?
I wonder if he read the book in social studies. (this one i'm not 100% sure about, mind you.)
On Monday, Ms. Smith gave us a science project.
The Amazon River is the longest river in South America.
Get me a Big Mac, would you?
Janet said wearily, "Could you help me up?"
C. developes, supports, or explains the main idea of a paragraph.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
When a text is argumental or persuasive, the authors claim will have evidence that backs up their claim in order to convince the audience to agree with them.
Bella's sequence is correct; For once, we can check the scale factor. The large side in the blue shape is 8 units long, while in the red shape it is 12. Hence, the scale factor is 12/8=1.5. Also, we have that the rotation part is correct, since the rotation needs to be 180 degrees to get an upside down version of the shape.
Marco's sequence is almost correct, but due to the reflection part, the 2 shapes should have the same orientation after this procedure. Hence, we get that the pointy parts of the shapes should point to the same direction. This is clearly not the case here, so Marco's procedure is wrong; in fact, his procedure yields almost the same object as the red one, only reflected along the y-axis.