Answer:
The answer is
<h2>Step-by-step explanation:
Area of a rectangle = length × width
Since we are finding the length of the rectangle
From the question
area = 5/8 square yards
width = 3/4 yard
So we have
We have the final answer as
Hope this helps you
Answer:
1) A. H0: p = 0.30
HA: p not equal to 0.30
2) A. The Independence Assumption is met.
C. The Randomization Condition is met.
D. The Success/Failure Condition is met.
3) Test statistic z = 2.089
P-value = 0.0367
4) C. Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the percentage of bills paid by medical insurance has changed.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.
The claim is that there is a significant change in the percent of bills being paid by medical insurance.
As we are looking for evidence of a difference, no matter if it is higher or lower than the null hypothesis proportion, the alternative hypothesis is defined by a unequal sign.
Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:
2) Cheking the conditions:
The independence assumption and the randomization condition are met as the bills were selected randomly from the population.
The 10% condition can not be checked, as we do not know the size of the population.
The success/failure condition is met as the products np and n(1-p) are bigger than 10 (the number of successes and failures are both bigger than 10).
3) The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.
The sample has a size n=9260.
The sample proportion is p=0.31.
The standard error of the proportion is:
Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:
This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:
As the P-value (0.0184) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to support the claim that there is a significant change in the percent of bills being paid by medical insurance.
first we try to semplify as much as possible the fractions.
First we decompose the numbers
789 = 3 * 263
548 = 2 * 2 * 137 = 2^2
they have nothing in common, so the first fraction remains so
89 = 89 (prime number)
887 = 887 (prime number)
they have nothing in common, so the second one remains so
688 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 43 = 2^4 * 43
8724 = 2 * 2 * 3 * 727 = 2^2 * 3 * 727
they have 2^2 (=4) in common, so the numerator and the denominator can be devided by 4
so:
now we calculate the common denominator
take the scomposition:
548 = 2^2 * 137
887 = 887
2181 = 3 * 727
take every number one time
so the common denominator is 2^2 * 137 * 887 * 727 * 3 = 1'060'131'756
now calculate every single numerator: first we divide each denominator by the common denominator, then we moltiply the result with each numerator
first fraction: 789/548
1060131756 / 548 = 1934547
1934547 * 789 = 1526357583
second fraction: 89/887
1060131756 / 887 = 1195188
1195188 * 89 = 106371732
third one: 172/2181
1060131756 / 2181 = 486076
486076 * 172 = 83605072
now we can delete the common denominator
1526357583x - 106371732 = 83605072
solve it
1526357583x = 83605072 + 106371732
1526357583x = 189976804
x = 1526357583 / 189976804
decompose
1526357583 = 887 * 3 * 3 * 727 * 263
189976804 = 137 * 2 * 2 * 211 * 53 * 31
nothing in common
x = 1526357583 / 189976804