Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
So that way we have a thought of how the government works
1. A thought of other should be respect
2. The environment should be created for dialogue between the conflicting parties
3. For all equal justice should be given
Answer:
The question above only has question 1, the question (2) is empty so an answer would be provided for question 1. The answer to the question above is given below:
Explanation:
"Civilian" in the question is someone who is not trained to serve a nation in the armed forces such as the military, police force unit Though, in some countries, civilians work in those units to perform other tasks like overseeing the military duties or ensure payment of salaries but they don't wear uniforms.
An elected public official as the commander-in-chief is a civilian elected by the citizens of a particular country by voting or other systems to take charge as the chief controller of the country's armed forces.
one advantage of having a civilian who is an elected public official as the commander-in-chief is:
1. Some countries in the world frown against military governments from other countries and they prefer a civilian as the commander-in-chief because the civilian commander-in-chief shows the choice of the people and this gives the civilian commander-in-chief the authority to make executive agreements with other countries. It allows some decision-making to pass through the country's senate thereby eliminating some lone decision-making power that may be found when a military official is a commander-in-chief.
Do u want random Indian Cinema Stars? Because u didnt include anything else….
