Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
Sullas seizure of Rome in 82 B.C. was partly the legacy of a new military recruitment system. Lucius Cornelius Sullas was given command of the war in Asia Minor. The Roman council attempted to then give leadership of the war to Marcus, this then resulted in a civil war. Lucius Sullas won and seized Rome.
False
They gave more power to the state powers.
Most South American countries gained independence between 1810 and 1830.
