Answer:
The correct response is Option D. The Maryland General Assembly does not have a mayor.
Explanation:
The Maryland General Assembly has two chambers, the House of Delegates and the Senate. This makes it a bicameral government in organizational structure. The State Senate has 47 Senators, and there are 141 representatives in the House of Delegates. The Maryland General Assembly also has a Speaker of the House of Delegates and a President in the Senate who are authorities in each chamber as they decide who sits on which committees and they preside over the daily meetings and discussions.
One such argument would be that <span>Investments by the upper class create lower-class jobs.
Although wealth gap is indeed a serious problem and needs to be dealt with, there are certain counter arguments which prove the opposite. This is one of them, given that upper classes invest a lot of money in the country so lower classes can work as well.
</span>
Answer:
transmission
Explanation:
In simple words, The transmission communication paradigm defines interaction as a yet another-way, sequential mechanism wherein the source conveys the message and communicates it via a medium to the recipient who computes it.
The propagation of the text is frequently interrupted by ambient and semantic interference. This strategy is generally too simplistic to catch FtF experiences, but may be beneficial for computer-oriented communication.
Answer:
The type of noise which hindered Josefina’s ability to accurately decode her brother’s message was psychological.
Explanation:
Psychological noise is a communication hindrance that takes place when we have too much on our minds. When we bring emotions, biases, stereotypes, judgments into the conversation, chances are we will ignore the real message the other is trying to convey. Josefina's anger was occupying her thoughts, so to speak. She was, for that reason, unable to focus on what her brother was saying. She could only think of her own feelings. That mental interference hindered communication between the two.
Answer:
An appellate court can <u>modify</u> a lower court's decision
Explanation:
When a case is tried in a lower court, the losing party is allowed to appeal the lower court's decision if it does not agree with it.
In such instances, the case is then tried in an appellate court. The <u>appellate court, on review of evidence and after hearing the merits of the case, has the power to </u><u>modify</u><u> or reverse the decision of the lower court.</u>