Answer:
The scientist’s conclusion is not appropriate because it is based on a subjective appreciation (“significantly greater than”).
<em>How “greater” is “significantly greater”?
</em>
A more objective and technical approach would be fixing a level of significance, let's say 0.05 or 0.01 for example, measuring the samples means and standard deviations and then proceeding with an appropriate hypothesis testing in order to see if the differences in means are really significant.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a or b
Step-by-step explanation:
it should be p≥18
greater then or equal to 18. because if you have 18, you can get the group rate and I'd you have more than 18 you can also get the group rate.
Answer:
1 out of 6
Step-by-step explanation:
So basically the shortest is one person in the group of six aand 1/6 cant be simplified so yeah
Answer:
no she needs $2.20 more
Step-by-step explanation:
2+ 1.10+.05= $3.15
$5.35 - $3.15 = the answer
