Answer:
I agree.
Explanation:
Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was a scholar of great wisdom. He recognized the shortcomings of both English society and Muslim society in India, moreover, he knew how these shortcomings created disagreements and gaps between the two populations and that this was very damaging to his people.
The 1857 revolt made these gaps even bigger. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan sided with the British, but he did not fail to point out that the revolt and all the violence resulting from it was the fault of the British, in ignoring the needs and factors that make up Indian culture, in addition to establishing colonialism in a very aggressive, which caused the Indian elites to revolt and seek to free themselves from this type of government. Based on that, he advised he advised the British on ways to please the Indian population, allowing that population to have a voice and to help with the administration of the country. This was one of the greatest achievements of his life, because it brought these two populations together, for a certain period of time.
<span>After the United Nations determined the conflict in Darfur and concluded that it was not a 'Genocide', The U.N Security Council passed the Resolution 1556 which demanded that the Sudanese government disarms the Janjaweed and brings justice to those leaders who had incited and carried out human rights abuses.</span>
Answer:
he was a hero and is best known for his truly heroic final act: incarcerated in the Warsaw ghetto, with nearly 200 children from the orphanage he ran, he decided to refuse the offers of rescue he received from his Polish friends, and to accompany the children instead on their journey to Treblinka
Explanation:
hope it helps
The result of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) meeting in 1993 during the Clinton administration was the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is a legal agreement between many countries, whose purpose was to foster international trade by reducing or eliminating trade barriers such as tariffs or quotas.
GATT was signed by 23 nations in Geneva on 30 October 1947, and took effect on 1 January 1948. It remained in effect until 123 nations in Marrakesh on 14 April 1994, signed the Uruguay Round Agreements, which created the World Trade Organization (WTO) on 1 January 1995. The WTO is a successor to GATT.
The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.
<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>
The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.
So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.
