1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlexFokin [52]
3 years ago
6

How did the oil boom have an economic impact on Texas?

History
2 answers:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
8 0
It made them have money.
Marysya12 [62]3 years ago
3 0

Explanation:

The Texas oil boom, sometimes called the gusher age, was a period of dramatic change and economic growth in the U.S. state of Texas during the early 20th century that began with the discovery of a large petroleum reserve near Beaumont, Texas. The find was unprecedented in its size (worldwide) and ushered in an age of rapid regional development and industrialization that has few parallels in U.S. history. Texas quickly became one of the leading oil-producing states in the U.S.

You might be interested in
Which of the following was a direct consequence of the European trading of firearms with Native Americans? English insistence th
Basile [38]

The correct answer is "Increased death toll and violence of King Philip's War Native Americans' "

The Iroquois were provided with firearms through the Hudson River from the Dutch and English merchants, which  reverberated as more casualties in the war, once guns were deadlier than their usual weapons. Iroquois war now had greater tolls, increasing the practice of "Mourning Wars", a technique where the Iroquois took captives of neighboring groups, submitted them into a ritual and then they were adopted to replace the dead Iroquois. The tribe ascended into a war and violence vicious cycle. With the advent of diseases the ferret village was almost completely destroyed in 1650.


7 0
3 years ago
What was a main difference between French conservatives and liberals following the Congress of Vienna
LiRa [457]

The liberals did not want an elected parliament.


3 0
3 years ago
Triple Alliance or Triple Entente? Controlled the seas surrounding Europe
Anastaziya [24]
The correct answer for this question is Triple Entente. 
The seas surrounding Europe were controlled by Triple Entente. This is an informal treaty between Great Britain, France, and Russia. It was anchored on the Franco-Russian military alliance (1894),  Anglo-French entente<span> (1904), and an Anglo-Russian </span>entente<span> (1907). </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
About 300,000 Chinese immigrants came from
Inessa [10]

Answer:

yeah that is a lot of numbers

Explanation:

that is reallyy cool

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Confederacy have so much trouble organizing for the war
astra-53 [7]
The political, economic, and military strength of the Union was much greater than that of the Confederacy. However, the war did last four years. The Confederacy proved itself resilient on many occasions. Throughout the war the tide constantly shifted, and with that so did the political, economic, and military strength of either side. Although each side had its share of military successes, in the end, the superior Northern economy, centralized government and overwhelming manpower would eventually lead to victory. In mid 1863, both the Union and the Confederacy could have won the war although; the Confederacy lacked the industry, or manpower to wage a long war with the Union.

The Union was far more industrialized than the South. The North possessed 80% of total U.S. industry. In addition, most Confederate industry was located in the Upper South-particularly in Virginia. The Confederacy lost a great deal of potential industry and manpower when West Virginia, Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland joined the Union instead of the Confederacy. The loss of these states to the Union was as much a testament to shrewd northern politics (Maryland) as it was to opposition within the states (West Virginia). Confederate industry, especially with the loss of these states, was unable to compete with the Union.

In addition to the South's lack of industry, most capital was invested in slaves and land-both of these are non-liquid. The South's lack of a large supply of liquid capital made it difficult for Southerners to buy munitions for the war effort. As a result of the South's lack of liquid capital the North enjoyed a decided advantage..



Glad to help :)

-liyah❤
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what sections of the country did the populists gain their greatest support
    15·1 answer
  • "Perseus" is an ancient Greek myth. Describe Perseus. What qualities make him a hero? What do these qualities tell you about wha
    11·1 answer
  • Materially enslaved examples (this is religion)
    13·2 answers
  • Directions: True or False
    5·1 answer
  • Paul wrote ___________ for the concert for new york, which was organized for the 9/11 victims. paul included the live cut as a h
    6·1 answer
  • Plzzz help and A is not the answer but I don’t know what is the answer!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • The 5th and 14th Amendments both contain a due process clause. The Due Process Clause guarantees that
    6·1 answer
  • "By 1860 the Midwest and the East were united by a network of
    7·1 answer
  • in march 1865 who was waging a campaign against general Robert E. Lee’s in petersburg’s and richmond ?
    10·2 answers
  • 12. Was the entire war dominated by trench warfare? Explain
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!