8cm, since 6 full squares and 4 halves
hope it helps...!!!
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
The expanded form of 0.368 is
.3 + .06 + .008
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
Julie wants to cut her hair 9 inches off from 16 inches
<h3>Part A </h3>
Expression
<h3>Part B</h3>
Calculation
<h3>Part C</h3>
Explanation of steps
- 1 - note the point 16 on the number line
- 2 - move left by 9 points on the number line
- 3 - note point 7 as answer
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.