Running for the bus, the rain began to pour.
If you really think about, it's saying that the rain is running for the bus, which makes NO sense. Here, read it again...
<em>Running for the bus, the rain </em>began to pour.
The author wasn't specific about <em>who </em>exactly was running for the bus.
Not sure if it asks you to do this, but if you were to change it and make it agree, it would be "<u><em>As I was running for the bus</em></u><u>,</u> the rain began to pour." There're other ways to write it of course, but the point is that now you know who actually ran for the bus, and it makes sense.
If your options are:
<span>A. It allowed future legislators to reword the constitution.
B. It allowed future legislators to abolish the constitution
C. It allowed future legislators to amend the constitution.
D. all of the above
I would say the answer is </span>C. It allowed future legislators to amend the constitution. This article basically says that the Constitution doesn't have to remain identical until the end of time (however perfect or adequate it is). It can be changed (amended) under certain conditions - if two thirds of the houses or a few states agree about it, they can call a convention and propose the changes they would like to make.
Your answer is Bob Cratchit
