"Schenck v. United States" was the landmark case in which <span>a unanimous court ruled that speech posing a clear and present danger especially during wartime may be suppressed. This case came to the Supreme Court of the United States in the year 1919. I hope that this is the answer that has helped you.</span>
True the stenting versus aggressive medical therapy trial support stenting for subgroups with intracranial stenosis
<h3>What is
aggressive medical therapy?</h3>
Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy for at least 3 months, blood pressure control, statin use with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) goal of 70 mg/dL, smoking cessation, and a body mass index of 25 kg/m2 were all considered aggressive medical management (2).
Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial rationale, design, and implementation of aggressive risk factor management.
Intracranial stenosis, also known as intracranial artery stenosis, is the narrowing of a cerebral artery that can result in a stroke. The narrowing is caused by plaque, which is a buildup and hardening of fatty deposits. This is referred to as atherosclerosis.
To know more about follow the link:
brainly.com/question/25960579
#SPJ4
The answer is house and increase
Answer:
Transparency is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Uncertain - 99%.
Explanation:
Predicting or forecasting the future could be measured with a sense of certainty or uncertainty. If a person sees dark clouds on the sky, they would be more certain than uncertain that it's an omen of rain. If you are collecting relevant data and then apply it to a forecast having less than 1% of certainty of reducing the degree of risk, conditions are uncertain. And, if measured from 1% to 100%, substracting that 1% of certainty leaves a 99& of uncertainty.