Answer: Grease the loaf pan thoroughly using shortening, cooking oil, or butter. Spread it evenly on the bottom and all sides of the pan using your fingers or a folded paper towel. If you are baking a sweet dessert bread, stop here; the pan is ready to be used
Explanation: Brainliest
"A coherent narrative will be easy to follow and more enjoyable for your reader." Looking at this, we see the words, "easy to follow," and, "more enjoyable." These are our clue words. We can rule our both A, B and D because none fit in as a definition referring to easy. C, however, fits the definition and this is your answer.
"A 'connected' narrative will be easy to follow and more enjoyable for your reader."
This is a question based on exploring cultural identity, and based on the excerpt that is attached to this question, the type of rhetoric that is used in order to persuade the readers the accuracy of Anaya's conclusion is an appeal that is based on the characters of the author. Hope this helps.
What is the similarity between 85,17 ,19, 4 and 2:
they all are less than 85
they all are greater than 1
they all are positive integers
they all are real numbers
they are all natural numbers
they are all whole numbers
none of them is multiples of 3
Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are not correct, as the exclusivity contract that Koko Marius signed was not yet over.
You did not show the text to which this question refers, but through questions similar to yours, we can see that this question refers to the text presented in the figure below.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Koko Marius signed the exclusive contract with the JiMing Company of his own free will.
- This contract required the exclusivity of one year of work, which is a rational and legal period.
- In this case, Koko Marius cannot justify breaking the contract because he was seeking professional growth, as he could legally do so after a short period.
In this case, we can affirm that Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are incorrect regarding the breach of contract, since, under the law, this breach of contract was illegal.
More information:
brainly.com/question/12790234?referrer=searchResults
