Based on Teddy Roosevelt's quote "We draw the line against misconduct, not against wealth," the option that explains his position is C. because trusts are not all bad, only those trusts which employ practices that do not benefit the public as a whole should be abolished. Roosevelt did not oppose the accumulation of wealth, but he did oppose the improper use of that wealth when it negatively impacted society overall as was the case with many trusts and monopolies in the late 19th and early 20th centuries (and in some cases today).
1) He was trying to Unite the country, no longer and south, but one country.
2)He abolished Slavery and needed the South to come to terms with this to enforce the laws.
Answer:
Equality is about ensuring that every individual has an equal opportunity to make the most of their lives and talents. ... Equality recognises that historically certain groups of people with protected characteristics such as race, disability, sex and sexual orientation have experienced discrimination.
Answer: .
Vote, voice an opinion at a city council meetings, or write to an elected leader
Explanation:
The question is about how an Arizona citizen could influence local political decisions.
Option A about voting every 4 years during the presidential election will not affect the local political decision but rather affects federal decision since voting for the president is at the Federal level.
Option B is about voting, voicing an opinion at a city council meetings, or writing to an elected leader. This shows that the decision being taken here will influence local politics. Here, the decision affects the lowest level of government which is at the local level.
Option C about accepting that nothing can be done and try to avoid being frustrated about local issues is wrong. Everyone has to role to play in governance and doing this won't impact positively on the local politics.
Subscribing to a news app, and watching the presidential debates or share political news on social media isn't influencing local political decisions in Arizona.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
Majority of the opinions of the supreme court are important because They establish Legal precedents....
Hopefully this helps :)
