The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not specify the time in history or any specific context, we are going to assume that you are referring to the US imperialistic role through history.
Being that the case, we can comment on the following.
The foreign policy actions of the United States reflect selfish, imperialist ambitions since the times of President James Polk and the Manifested Destiny. He expanded the US territory acquiring the Mexican northern states after the Mexican-American War.
Since those years, passing through the times of President Monroe and the Monroe Doctrine and President Theodore Roosevelt and his Roosevelt corollary, the United States has always had interventionist purposes as part of its foreign agenda.
Nobody has granted the US the right or role to be the "big brother" who was looking after the interests of the western hemisphere. That is why the US has had many problems throughout history in the Middle East, Latin America, Europe, and other regions.
diseases from Europeans killed many native Americans because they were not immune to those diseases
Answer:
Explanation: coastal and plateau are different areas so you could talk about the food they ate / hunted. I think google would be your best option.
Answer:
a) Briefly explain ONE important social or political response to the conflict over slavery in the period 1850-1855. One political response to slavery during 1850-55 was the idea of popular sovereignty. ... During the time period of 1855-60, "Bleeding Kansas" became a response to slavery.
Explanation:
Answer:
Which statements summarize Justice Brown’s message? Check all that apply.
Separation does not necessarily create inequality.
Separation implies inferiority.
Laws that permit separation can be constitutional.
The law cannot permit separation to occur.
Separation always creates inferiority.
Explanation:
A & C
