I'm thinking chocolate since I'm pretty sure lots of people rationed sugar during WWII. I don't think they would have rationed weapons, automobiles or water. Hope that helps.
So all the power isnt in one persons hands, and because if checks and balances werent here one person would hold all the power which would be bad :)
C. Chinese communist leaders worked directly to serve rural peasants. Soviet leaders viewed themselves as guides for urban workers.
IF that helped make sure to mark brainliest! <3
-procklown
The freeing of serfs in Russia was an expression of liberalism because it advocated individuals having personal freedom. As Alexander said to the nobles, "The existing condition of owning souls cannot remain unchanged."
However, what was done in freeing the serfs expressed conservatism because the arrangement ultimately favored the nobles, leaving half of the lands in their hands and requiring payment from the serfs to the nobles for any lands transferred to them.
Note: The Civil War in the USA began in the same year that the emancipation of serfs was proclaimed in Russia. Technically, serfdom in Russia was not the same as slavery in the United States. Landowners did not own the serfs as property, but because they were bound to the land as workers for the landowner who owned the land, their resulting situation was similar. And because they were given legal freedom but had to pay for any land they would acquire from the nobles, the cost of their freedom was high.
The Soviet government followed a policy of collectivization <span> when it took private property after WWI without payments to the former owners.</span>
