The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I do not agree with what John Green said.
John Green stated that it might have been better if the Persians beat the Greeks. His arguments were that the Persian life was not bad. Persians ruled prosperous cities. And he comments that life was not easy in ancient Greece if you were a woman or a slave.
Of course, Greece was not perfect and had many issues. But the Persia Empire also had its many issues too.
I think it was good that Greece won the Persian Wars. The Greek victory established a foundation of a classical time in which Greece "exported" the idea of democracy to other states, as well as the philosophical ideas of great thinkers of Athens. Arts, literature, sculpture, and architecture were other important Greek influences that transcended the test of time.
The period from 1920-29 is often called the 'Roaring Twenties' because it was a time of noise, lively action and economic<span> prosperity. The First World War had been good for American business.</span>
Hindus and Muslims in the colony of India could not resolve their religious differences. The religious conflicts between Hindus and Muslims has been a historic tension. In the early 700s, this struggle between them has raged since Islam spread into the Indian Peninsula. This tension was a major factor in the partition of the British colony of India (India and Pakistan) in the 20th century. While Hindu Indians dominated the central and eastern part of the Indian subcontinent, Muslim Indians dominated the western part of the region (Pakistan).
A democratic thinking grew among the poor and lower classes and many Indians began demanding complete independence from British rule. Gandhi's passive resistance, helped inspire a mass movement, which finally convinced the British.
<em>Hindu-Muslim conflict in India has been going on for centuries.</em>
