Answer:
Annexation
Explanation:
Annexation is different from Conquest.
in conquest , we use our military force to make another country surrender and take over the control through force.
In Annexation, a country take control over another country through administrative/legislative method. Usually, this can be done by obtaining the support from the majority of the people who live in that other country. When most of the people wanted to join, the government will become more likely to legally hand over the control and become part of the union.
I think it's D. (I'm just guessing)
Answer: He felt the bank was unconstitutional/harmful to the states rights
Explanation: My BrAiN
Answer:
As every culture includes different ways of earning living, religions, traditions in clothing, foods, etc, the immigrants (who are new to territory) will bring with them their culture into the new life in the new place. For example, you can see people from India wearing their traditional clothings in Russia, and they never think about changing their "style"; The Indians can open their own restaurants, and the Russian people may be interested in trying original traditional Indian food.
So, I think the culture of "native people" will not be changed a lot by immigrants, however, the native people have opportunities to experience new things that may be good or not good for them, and their mind about foreigners will change someway.
Besides, we have a definition "Globalization", and this term must include the issue of influence of either immigrants' or native people' culture in some aspects.
Explanation:
This is just my personal opinion.
I hope this answer will help you. Have a nice day.
Answer:
For the first, I would say being poorly represented.
For the second, ignorance and morals.
Explanation:
A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.
It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.