Explanation:
by reading the questions then go through the passage underlinining the answer
c. primal is what I believe it is
Answer:
Credible evidence
Explanation:
Eyewitness accounts – this is not the right answer. There is actually no eyewitness in that specific sense of the word when it comes to literal work.
Personal narrative – this is not correct. The analysis is a scientific method and it should not use personal accounts. Therefore, the personal narrative is not the analysis.
<u> Credible evidence – this is the correct answer.</u> <u>When trying to do the literal analysis one should use as objective facts as possible.</u> This means they should note facts, <u>such as the name of the author, the name of the work, publisher, etc. </u>All these are credible evidence that can be easily confirmed and which are objective.
Alternate ending – this is not the right answer. The point of the analysis is not to change the narrative or speculate, so an alternative ending should not be included.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
if there was a famine there then it is most likely a cause if they were hungry or starving they would pay whatever is needed, in the end it said "until his bag was full of money."
b doesn't sound right cause spider's greed was already there having the stone be his ticket for money cause of the famine doesn't change that he was greedy. c and d also doesn't sound right cause kofi wasn't being selfish if he just took what he needed and suspicious doesn't sound right because the stone was asking spider to set them down, so they didn't even wanted to be paraded around, which makes a make more sense
