1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Volgvan
2 years ago
12

How did the power given to junior queen bring instability in the politics of Nepal?​

Social Studies
1 answer:
anygoal [31]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

There are some reasons behind the political instability in Nepal.First is the volatile internal political structure. The Nepalese leaders have not been able to institutionalize the political changes and have been experimenting with different systems. The Palace was also involved in this thing.Next is the geo -political interests of India, china and the western powers. Their struggle to maintain their influence in Nepal did not allowed Nepali politics to be stable. They got involved in change of leadership and systems in Nepal so that their interests could be established. India seems to be wanting complete control over Nepali leadership and then in over the economy, hydro power, and other developmental activities. It wants Nepal to be dependent over itself and so far is successful in it. China is more concerned about Free Tibet movement. There are many Tibetan refugees in Nepal. The Western powers, with the help from India, want to utilize the Tibetan refugees for Free Tibet movement.Next is the lack of strong alternative political leadership. Nepalese people have to vote for the same inefficient political leadership every time. Also, the Nepalese voters are not willing sufficiently to change the leadership

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What European river is represented on the map? A) Danube B) Rhine C) Seine Eliminate D) Volga
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Danube

PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST IF POSSIBLE

3 0
3 years ago
Why is international trade better for all countries than an attempt for each country to produce everything it needs?
kvasek [131]

International trade is better for all countries because it creates a global market in which all countries can trade based on their individual abilities.

No country is able nor it has the resources necessary to produce all the needed goods on its own. In order to do so, natural resources, labor market and manufactures would have to be working perfectly all the time.

Most countries share their trading business with others, exchanging material, labor force or the already produced goods. This way, each country does what it knows it does best and the poorer, not so developed nations are taken into consideration as well. This creates an international cooperation of nations that support each other in difficult times and provides for stability in the world's economy, enhancing fair competition, free labor movement and fair prices.

7 0
3 years ago
Why in the heck do we run out of answers
Yuri [45]

Answer:

To avoid spam, hate messages, etc.

But, this is weird as you can have unlimited comments.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which president rejected the theory of keynesian economics?
Kitty [74]

President Ronald Reagan rejected the theory of Keynesian economics, this theory proposed by John Maynard Keynes, embodied in his work General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, published in 1936 in response to the Great Depression of 1929, the central principle of this school of thought is that state intervention can stabilize the economy, Keynesianism is one of the best-known economic theories, its main characteristic is that it supports interventionism as the best way out of a crisis and as a mechanism to stimulate demand and regulate the economy in times of depression.
5 0
3 years ago
During the trial, prosecutors had to present sensitive and horrifying materials, including photographs of victims and evidence o
givi [52]

I would have taken the same approach as the Nuremberg prosecutors because the Nazi leaders committed a crime against humanity through the Holocaust.

<h3>What was the Holocaust?</h3>

The Nazi Party in Germany decided on the Final Solution to the Jewish question by committing genocide.

During the Holocaust, more than 6 million European Jews were massacred in concentration camps and through gas chambers.

The crime of systematically cleansing an ethnic group is a crime against humanity.

Thus, I would have taken the same approach as the Nuremberg prosecutors because the Nazi leaders committed a crime against humanity through the Holocaust.

Learn more about the Holocaust at brainly.com/question/12962

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which legislative act did Upton Sinclair's novel The Jungle help bring about?
    8·2 answers
  • Which sub-Saharan country first made education for children required?
    13·1 answer
  • Negative effects of inequality
    15·1 answer
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of youth in politics?
    5·1 answer
  • Is democracy primarily a system of representative government in which people elect representatives?Explain.
    9·1 answer
  • How many years did each of these dynasties last
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Mediterranean climate influence culture in the region?
    5·1 answer
  • Tactics used to maintain influence and popularity differ among leaders. Which of the following approaches
    10·2 answers
  • according to john stuart mill’s principle of harm, the only ground on which the government should intervene in the conduct of an
    10·1 answer
  • What are some of the mental processes that help us function smoothly in our environment?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!