Abuse in power and oppression, unquestionably, leads to conflict. During the Currency Act of 1764, Great Britain started taxing all paper goods, and other everyday goods to the colonies. These taxes were unjust and not fair. Britain abused their power by forcing these taxes upon them without consent and/or their say in it. This leads to debt and angry people, which leads to riots and destruction. Upon that, the people took sides, some were ok with these acts, believing that they were fair. This created more conflict between the people of the colonies. Wars break out because of disagreements, which can also lead to more debt and anger. This cruel oppression also emerged the famous, well-known saying of "No Taxation without Representation". This meant that they didn't want to be taxed without representation in the British parliament. These are one of many ways that abuse in power and oppression leads to conflict.
The phenomena that describe the direct relationship between money and spending is called the supply-side economics. This theory support Reagan and Bush beliefs of cutting the taxes encourage the people to work more and at the same time give back to the economy through consumer spending; it also allows more investors in business and industry. Unfortunately, the side effect of Reaganomics is the economic recession; it causes a high rate of unemployment for farmers and employees.
Answer:
The South had mild winters, and long, hot, humid summers.
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure it's true :)
B) mostly urban populations