Answer:
No, she did not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to answer if Mae stayed within her budget, given her budget and the total amount she later spent.
To solve this problem, what we need to do is to add up all what she budgeted. Afterwards we add up all she spent. Then , we see the difference between the two to actually know if she stayed within her budget of not.
We proceed as follows:;
Let’s calculate budgeted amount: This is ; 180 + 475 + 15 + 50 + 65 + 25 + 150 + 30 = $990
Now, let’s calculate how much she later spent; That would be; 182 + 475 + 12 + 65 + 68 + 12.5 + 36 + 150 = $1000.5
We can see that she spent more that the amount she had budgeted. This means she didn’t stay within the total amount allocated for her budget
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Merchantability.
Explanation:
An Implied Warranty is a type of grant provided by warranties stating the purpose of a product is fit to the purpose it was made for. This warranty can be provided written or verbally. The implied warranty of merchantability specifies that goods purchased must meet a standard of quality, value, and grade compared to other goods sold under the same circumstances.
The warranty of merchantability is supported by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) which is adopted by most states in the U.S.
Answer:
The Roosevelt Corollary was an extension of which of the following policies?
the gold standard
the Dawes Act
the Treaty of Paris
the Monroe Doctrine
Explanation:
The Roosevelt Corollary was an extension of which of the following policies?
the gold standard
the Dawes Act
the Treaty of Paris
the Monroe Doctrine
The Roosevelt Corollary was an extension of which of the following policies?
the gold standard
the Dawes Act
the Treaty of Paris
the Monroe Doctrine
The Roosevelt Corollary was an extension of which of the following policies?
the gold standard
the Dawes Act
the Treaty of Paris
the Monroe Doctrine
