Answer:
The annual financial disadvantage of eliminating the division is $30,000.
Explanation:
contribution margin = revenue - variable costs = $200,000
fixed expenses = $500,000
net loss = $300,000.
If the division is eliminated, only $170,000 of the fixed expenses can be avoided, therefore the company's fixed expenses will remain at $330,000.
Therefore, eliminating the children's division will result in a $30,000 (= $330,000 - $300,000) decrease in net income.
The type of business ownership is best suited to her needs limited partnership. Thus option (C) is correct.
<h3>What is Partnership Business?</h3>
A partnership business consists of two or more individuals who pool their resources to create a company and agree to split the risks, rewards, and losses.
Law firms, medical groups, real estate investment firms, and accountancy groups are examples of common partnership businesses.
According to the above, scenario, Molly with her husband and the sister-in- law as partners wanted to start a business. She wants faster decision making, least regulation and ease in doing business.
All the requirement of her matches with the limited partnership type of the business where the liability of all the partners are limited to their amount of investment.
Thus option (C) is correct.
Learn more about partnership here:
brainly.com/question/12983082
#SPJ1
Answer:
Red Oak 3,136
Cyril Inc 1,470
Total net revenue 4,606
Explanation:
Red Oak
4,000 - 20% trade-in allowance = 3,200
if payment within discount period: 3,200 x 2% = 64
3,200 - 64 = 3,136 for Red Oak
Cyril Inc
1,500 not qualificable for allowance
payment within discount period
1,500 x 2% = 30
1,500 - 30 = 1,470 for Cyril Inc
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
On March 9
Cash A/c Dr $300
To Account receivable - Green A/c $300
(Being the cash received is recorded)
For recording the cash receipts we debited the cash account and credited the account receivable account so that the correct posting can be done
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
D) express agency
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about Marlon who intends to sell a piece of real estate he owns and contracts Nita, a real estate broker, to make the sale. In the contract, Marlon authorizes Nita to make the sale at or above a minimum price he wants and the date by which he wants the sale to be completed. The contract also stipulates that Marlon should not hire another broker to sell that piece of land till the expiry of the contract period. Nita finds a suitable buyer, makes the sale in time, and is paid by Marlon for her services. In this case, the types of agency had Marlon and Nita entered into is express agency. Express agency can be regarded as an agency that is been set up through an oral or a written agreement that exist between agent and principal. This gives indication of their express intent as regards this representational status. In this agency, the written or spoken words of the principal is used in authorizing the agent so that he can to act on behalf of the principal. An agency can be regarded as contract which could be express or implied.
