<span>How did the Russians defeat both Hitler and Napoleon?
</span>
<span>First
off, they started pretty well. When the Germans first invaded, the
people thought they were being liberated (tells you a lot about the
government at the time) and were treated pretty well. But then they
started killing people and things went downhill. Now, Hitler had this
grand idea to take over Stalingrad (mostly for its namesake, Stalin). He
thought it would be a massive blow to the Russian morale. But instead
of basing his military strageties on logic, he did on feelings (he
wanted to beat Stalin); which is never a good thing. Unforunately, he
didn't anticipate Russian winter (which, luckily for the Russians, came
early that year and ironically the same year for Napoleon). So the
German army was stuck in Summer gear, rather then the proper Winter gear
(which was promised but never came through). AND look at Russia as a
whole: It's a huge country (I heard it takes around 8-10 days to just
get through Russia straight across). Now, to the other guy above me.
Russia isn't known for having the strongest armies ever. Actually,
compared to the Germans they were undisclipined, untrained and from all
types of backgrounds, and all ages, etc. Hardly sounds like an ideal
army. But the Russian people were stubborn and burned everything, so in
that way the German army failed. Plus, Russia had an endless supply of
men. Hitler was shocked to notice, there was always a fresh supply of
men waiting to fight.
So in conclusion, Russia's massive land(s) and brutal winters
contributed to both the fails of Napoleon and Hitler's conquer of
Russia. </span>
Answer:
A. They were extremely precise and successful in every attack.
Explanation:
Depth charges are quite literally explosives in a barrel that sink to a set depth before exploding. They wouldn't be 100% accurate due to them tumbling as they went down into the water. You usually needed at least a couple of Depth charges before you could knock out a Jerry (slang word for German during world war 2, fun fact!) U-Boat submarine, and this still applies today.
In 1830 Congress, urged on by President Andrew Jackson, passed the Indian Removal Act which gave the federal government the power to relocate any Native Americans in the east to territory that was west of the Mississippi River.
I would say that good judgement comes from considering the outcomes of your decisions.
This is not something that is a "talent": something that one is born with, or something that can be done without thinking too hard. Instead, one actually has to consider the outcomes of the decisions to be able to evaluate them.
Supreme Court allowed legal segregation - invalidated Civil Rights Act, Plessy vs. Ferguson and separate but equal doctrine
Don't worry chapter 18 is gonna be easier