Answer:
Expansion of empire and good economy.
Explanation:
Yes, I think Aurangzeb was a great king as Akbar because he got victories in the south and expanded the Empire to more than 4 million square kilometers. During his rule, economic condition of the empire is very good. His empire was the world's largest economy, consists of 25% of world's GDP. These two things i.e. expansion of empire and economy make the Aurangzeb a great king.
Answer:
Yes, sound research has demonstrated consistently that school choice policies improve public school performance. Thirty empirical studies (including all methods) have examined private school choice's impact on academic outcomes in public schools.
Explanation:
False
Many of Cromwell's actions that followed the end of the British Civil War were unwise and hypocritical. He was ruthless in controlling the revolts that took place within the army itself at the end of the war (linked to failure to pay troops) and showed little sympathy for the Levellers, an egalitarian movement that contributed heavily to the cause of parliament.
Cromwell dissolved the Republican Parliament in 1653 and took control of the state, as Lord Protector perpetual. His foreign policy led to a conflict with the Republic of the Seven Netherlands in 1652 - the First Anglo-Dutch War, which was eventually won by Admiral Robert Blake in 1654, with Cromwell already serving as Lord Protector. In 1655 it conquered the territory of Jamaica of the Spaniards, turning it into the main English colonial space in the Caribbean.
Any quarantine of a sovereign state can turn into war fairly quickly, especially when the country in question has deep alliances with other, perhaps more powerful, countries.
Explanation:
If the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics<span> had </span>nonappointive<span> to run the quarantine/blockade, the </span>US<span> would have </span>laid-off<span> on Soviet ships. </span>this could are an<span> act of war, </span>and therefore the state<span> would have had no </span>selection however to reply<span>. </span>this could<span> have dragged in </span>each<span> sides' allies, triggering </span>a replacement warfare<span>. And </span>an increase<span> to a nuclear exchange would </span>virtually actually have<span> occurred, as whichever </span>aspect<span> was losing </span>in a very typical<span> war would have had </span>very little selection, however,<span> use nukes or surrender.</span>
The problem was feeding all of the people
