John Locke believed all people were born with the right to life, liberty, and property
The two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
<h3>What is first amendment?</h3>
The first amendment was made in the year 1791. It protects a lot of the civil rights which include: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and so on.
Since the first amendment protects the freedom of speech we can conclude by saying that the two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
Read more on first amendments here: brainly.com/question/325850
#SPJ1
Yes gerrymandering is unconstitutional
The answer is C. Compare.
