Chris McCandless is the main character of the book <em>Into the Wild</em> by John Krakauer.
In this book, we learn that McCandless is the product of his father's second marriage. However, McCandless also learns that his father had not yet divorced his first wife when McCandless and his sister were born. Therefore, the father led a double life. This realization profoundly affected McCandless. This knowledge made him felt betrayed and angry. To some extent, this sense of betrayal and anger explains why the choices in life of McCandless are so different from the choices his parents wanted him to make.
Answer:
Initiation of dialogue, acceptance of diversity, awareness of spiritually and purity of character can make family and maintain universal brotherhood. vi) Everyone should treat other like friends, brothers, sisters or relatives.
Rahul is a husband and father. he is competitive and works hard to earn for his family. according to functionalists, Rahul plays an instrumental role.
In contrast, Parsons' males play an instrumental role as the provider of the family's income. Men can break down in such a demanding capacity since it is such a difficult, worrisome challenge. Therefore, a woman's role is to alleviate the men of this weight or stress by showing them love and understanding and by continuing to serve as the primary caregiver regardless of their own circumstances.
In order for the family to function properly, men and women must both play "expressive" and instrumental roles. This is what is meant by the sexual division of labor.
Learn more about the instrumental role here:
brainly.com/question/16243199
#SPJ4
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
