Comparative advantage I would think. Yep, Google-sensei confirmed it:) Comparative advantage is the answer.
Answer:
The first species to colonize an ecosystem that is previously damaged or disrupted
Explanation:
'cause it was the 1st meeting of it's kind... the 1st meeting of the north american continent
The governments of Japan and Italy were similar in the 1930s because <u>both used extreme nationalism to win support, and both began programs of aggressive expansion. </u>
The two countries which will be allied with Adolf Hitler in Germany during the Second World War led the same kind of policies. During the 1930s, however, only Japan was ruled by the military, but this was not the case of dictator Benito Mussolini. The two countries did not rely on a citizen army but rather on an army of professional soldiers.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
The situation of Japan and Italy was a little different in the 1930s, even if they both led aggressive programs of expansion. Japan was already very powerful in Asia and had some colonies like Korea and China. Italy was far behind the other great European powers and had only a few small colonies in Africa such as Libya, Eritrea, and Somalia.
The reasons for the expansionist policies of these two countries were not the same. Japan wanted to enlarge the empire to confirm their domination on the Asian continent, and especially to stop the communist threat. On another side, Italy had a spirit of revenge and wanted to recover the territories that European neighbors had refused, after the First World War at the signing of the Treaty of Versailles.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Benito Mussolini: brainly.com/question/268807
- The aggressive expansion of Japan: brainly.com/question/11774566
- The attack of Pearl Harbor: brainly.com/question/1380312
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Subject: History
Chapter: World War II
Keywords: Benito Mussolini, fascism, colonial empires, World War II, the similarity between Japan and Italy in the 1930s
Many Americans opposed the war on moral grounds, appalled by the devastation and violence of the war. Others claimed the conflict was a war against Vietnamese independence, or an intervention in a foreign civil war; others opposed it because they felt it lacked clear objectives and appeared to be unwinnable.