<span>1.The Northern Boundary was the city of Carchemish above Damascus in Syria.
2. The West Boundary was the Mediterranean Sea which included the cities of Tyre, Sidon, Byblos, Gaza, and in the south the western boundary extended past Tanis in Egypt to Libya.
3. The Eastern Boundary was the eastern portion of the Dead Sea, up to Damascus, Kadesh, and Carchemish in the north.</span>
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
According to Augustine, there exists a difference in God’s will to
a) Something occurring necessarily
b) Something occurring voluntarily.
He further states that necessity does not preclude freedom by comparing the sufficient conditions for necessity and sufficient conditions for freedom.
He said that God’s foreknowledge is about necessity while man’s power/will leads to freedom. He equate freedom with power while maintaining free will
Option B is correct
<span>Ksana's insistence that her boyfriend's car accident was due to his carelessness provides an example of a dispositional attribution. A dispositional attribution is the way to explain someones behavior due to internal characteristics that are found in each of us, it is different from external influences where the blame is placed on the environment or the culture around the person.</span>
C.
the other two are songs from bands.
Baseball is our national pastime
Answer:
Hi! The answer would be option C. Yes, because the defendant’s counterclaim does not meet the amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction.
Explanation:
A federal court may assert supplemental jurisdiction over a counterclaim that does not satisfy the jurisdictional amount when the counterclaim is compulsory. However, a permissive counterclaim does not qualify for supplemental jurisdiction and therefore must satisfy the jurisdictional amount and the rule of complete diversity. Here, the defendant's claim that the plaintiff owes her money does not arise out of the same transaction and occurrence as the plaintiff's injuries. Therefore, the defendant's counterclaim is permissive and must meet the amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction. Answer choice A is incorrect. Although the parties must maintain complete diversity, a permissive counterclaim must also meet the amount-in-controversy requirement. Answer choice B is incorrect. Although the federal district court may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over counterclaims, a permissive counterclaim needs to meet the requirements for federal subject-matter jurisdiction (either diversity or federal question). Answer choice D is incorrect. While it is true that the defendant's counterclaim is not compulsory, it would be possible for the federal court to assert diversity jurisdiction had the defendant met the amount-in-controversy requirement. Therefore, D is not the best answer choice.
