Answer:Group polarization
Explanation:
Group polarization is when a group which shares similar attitudes work together towards intensifying those attitudes more than they did when they had these ideas separately as individuals. Some intensified shared ideas may be risky such as when unrulyb mob gangs comes together to push their attitudes.
Some may breed fruitful actions such as mobilising together to protect the right of animals which may save lives of many animals.
Group Polarization makes an action possible that would have been impossible if someone was standing for the idea alone, numbers increase the strength of the idea to be implemented.
Group Polarization exist in order to give strength to persuasion, the attitude of a group is improved by their number more than it would if they were standing alone.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The actions that the Qin Dynasty would take against a person who wrote a book with their own opinions, about how they did not agree with the government were lethal.
Yes, during the Qin Dynasty in China, there was no freedom of speech or freedom of the press, or something similar. Quite the opposite.
Emperors during the Qin Dynasty were dictators and ruled an absolutists form of government. That is why they were the Emperors.
If someone expressed a critic or opposition against teh Emperor, he could be killed immediately. As simple as that. The Emperor was the absolute ruler and his word was the law.
Word human capital refer to
<u> knowledge, experience and skills of an employee.</u>
Answer: C
Explanation: they do not always generate immediate financial gains to the organization. It take a while for it to have that awareness needed to grow the company.
Answer:
Political culture
Explanation:
Political culture is a term in political science used to describe the set of beliefs, attitudes and shared views or normative judgments held by a population which defines political system. It does not refer to how a group or an individual views a particular political figure or specific actors in politics such as presidents or ministers but concerns the view of the whole political system.
