Answer:
Fair Value method, and only a portion of Ima's 2004 dividends represent earnings after Pal's acquisition.
Explanation:
The part of the dividend that reduce the carrying value of the investment can be said to be a liquidating dividend. Liquidating dividend is said to have occurred when the payment made by the investee is higher than the income that was earned in the course of the period in which the shares of the investee was owned by the investor.
On the other hand, the cost method treats liquidating dividends as spend or reduction in the investment account and treats normal dividend as income. Hence it is impossible for the firm to use equity method.
This is because dividend are seen as a reduction in investment account under the equity method. This means that dividends received cannot be taken as income in this method, hence C and D are wrong.
Answer: The correct answer is "C) giving up rather than standing up to the boss as required by law.".
Explanation: This is a situation of: <u>giving up rather than standing up to the boss as required by law.</u>
Michael should have sued his boss before the law so that he could instead be compensated for the bad treatment and discrimination and also collect unemployment compensation in the event that the employment relationship is terminated.
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
The correct answer is personal income.
A country’s personal income is the amount of income received by all of the country’s people in a given time period.
