<span>I believe that after that day, he federal government began paying farmers to take marginal lands out of production. I hope this helped, and if so, please mark as brainliest, thank you! (:</span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In interrogatories, the party that receive the question has legal obligation to answer it in a matter of fact manner.
The part that described in the excerpt is <em><u> depositions</u></em>. This is the initial phase where both parties can gather information before bringing it up to court. Even though there is a court reporter present, both parties that are involved in the depositions are not obligated to answer the questions that are trowed at them.
In the example above, Felipe could easily shrug the question and plead the fifth . He won't receive any legal punishment for doing it.
Answer:
The answer is - Becomes less dissatisfied and his or her motivation is unaffected
Explanation:
According to Fredrick Herzberg performance, recognition, job status, responsibility and opportunities for growth fall under Motivators or Satisfiers. While Hygiene factors or Dissatisfiers are about salary, secondary working conditions, the relationship with colleagues, physical work place and the relationship between supervisor and employee.
According to his research, he concluded that taking away the dissatisfaction factor does not necessarily mean that employees will be satisfied and to motivate a team using motivation factors the hygiene factors need to be taken care of first. Motivating a team means working on things that bother them and things that they complain about.
Taking away or reducing dissatisfaction does not also guarantee that their motivation will increase. However, when dissatisfaction is taken away then the organisation can focus on motivating employees effectively.
Therefore, an improved salary and working condition will decrease dissatisfaction but the employees motivation will still be unaffected.
(D personal stress. A) the extent to which people were integrated into the group life of a society. The awareness that allows people to comprehend the link between their immediate, personal social settings and the remote, impersonal social world is called: A) verstehen.
There is an existing legal theory in the US legal system that a State would always have the last say in enacting laws even inforced by the federal government. This legal concept is known as nullification. However, the condition to nullify a federal in a State would be first, for the State court to prove that the law is unconstitutional. Then a legal process has to be done so that the State law can prove to the federal courts that the law enacted and imposed by the federal government is unconstitutional.