1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ipn [44]
3 years ago
7

Explain how jews were treated during the roman empire

History
1 answer:
aliina [53]3 years ago
3 0
They WOULD HAVE been treated with the same consideration as others, but inevitably their treatment was harsh, simply because they refused to accept Roman rule for long, and kept rebelling. Around the year 66, Agrippa, nominally king of the jews, delivered a great speech warning the Jews and pleading with them not to start an insurrection. Among other things, he pointed out that if they rebelled, their holy city and Temple might be destroyed, since by "sparing these things up till now, the Romans have received no thanks at all."
Roman suppression of the various jewish revolts was often brutal, and led to great loss of life. Many rebels were killed in action or crucified during the various insurrections between 64 BCE and 135 CE, when the last one was put down. Ignoring agrippa proved very costly, since jerusalem and its temple were indeed destroyed. During Trajan's time, many rebels in the diaspora were killed, in cyprus etc. The crushing of the bar kochba revolt of 132-135 is said to have cost half a million jewish lives. Moreover, for nearly a century after 135, jews couldn't even live in jerusalem.
Besides the repercussions of rebellion, jews were penalized for not worshipping the deified caesars. There was a special tax, the fiscus judaicus, levied on them alone.
You might be interested in
What was the biggest challenge faced by George Washington when he agreed to lead the Continental Army?
artcher [175]

On this day in 1775, George Washington, who would one day become the first American president, accepts an assignment to lead the Continental Army.

Washington had been managing his family’s plantation and serving in the Virginia House of Burgesses when the second Continental Congress unanimously voted to have him lead the revolutionary army. He had earlier distinguished himself, in the eyes of his contemporaries, as a commander for the British army in the French and Indian War of 1754.

Born a British citizen and a former Redcoat, Washington had, by the 1770s, joined the growing ranks of colonists who were dismayed by what they considered to be Britain’s exploitative policies in North America. In 1774, Washington joined the Continental Congress as a delegate from Virginia. The next year, the Congress offered Washington the role of commander in chief of the Continental Army.

After accepting the position, Washington sat down and wrote a letter to his wife, Martha, in which he revealed his concerns about his new role. He admitted to his “dear Patcy” that he had not sought the post but felt “it was utterly out of my power to refuse this appointment without exposing my Character to such censures as would have reflected dishonour upon myself, and given pain to my friends.” He expressed uneasiness at leaving her alone, told her he had updated his will and hoped that he would be home by the fall. He closed the letter with a postscript, saying he had found some of “the prettiest muslin” but did not indicate whether it was intended for her or for himself.

On July 3, 1775, Washington officially took command of the poorly trained and under-supplied Continental Army. After six years of struggle and despite frequent setbacks, Washington managed to lead the army to key victories and Great Britain eventually surrendered in 1781. Due largely to his military fame and humble personality, Americans overwhelmingly elected Washington their first president in 1789.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A native american trail through the cumberland gap along the banks of the kentucky river was renamed _______.
SCORPION-xisa [38]
<span>After Daniel Boone and his party widened it, it was called Wilderness Road. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
What was the ruling in the Supreme Court case of tick wo v. Hopkins
brilliants [131]
"Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
8 0
3 years ago
"The Revolution consumed its own children" agree or disagree, and give an explanation
postnew [5]

Answer:

Agree

Explanation:

I agree because i just agree and i just asked my mom and she gave a long response I mean a long response

6 0
3 years ago
What was one result of agricultural changes in the Louisiana Colony during the 1780s and 1790s?
Semmy [17]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why might it have been hard for people in the thirteen colonies to join together? Select all that apply.
    12·1 answer
  • Which option most accurately compares the economic systems of the Massachusetts and Virginia colonies
    9·1 answer
  • Did early american leaders effectively balance the rights of individuals versus the rights of the majority? (beginnings to 1887)
    5·1 answer
  • If the demand curve shown above shifts to the right then the _______If the demand curve shown above shifts to the right then the
    12·2 answers
  • I need the answer to this question
    13·1 answer
  • If someone told you that the will destroy you and everyone you love, how would respond??
    10·2 answers
  • How did the contact of early European explorers affect the people of the Americas?
    13·2 answers
  • What is one Muslim belief that Jews and Christians do not share?
    6·1 answer
  • Summarise medieval people’s attitude to medicine in 25 words
    15·1 answer
  • Yo i needs helps help meh
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!