Answer: It is something that is really far away from the rest of your data
Step-by-step explanation: for example find the outlier: -1 2 3 7 10 20 the outlier is 20
Well, the best way to solve this would involve the Pythagorean theorem.
First, take the length of the hypotenuse (the string in this case) and square it. Do the same to the side length we are given (the kites height above the ground).
We then subtract the squared height from the squared hypotenuse. We should be left with 1,781m.
All we have to do now is find the square root of 1,781m.
Your answer for b is 42.20189569m.
Answer:
157
Step-by-step explanation:
formula- 2 x 3.14 x 5 squared
6.28 x 5 squared
6.28 x 25
157
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost price = $n
Mark up price = selling price- cost price
= (20% × $n)
Selling price = $n + (20% × $n)
Sales tax = 5% × ($n + (20% × $n))
Total cost = selling price + sales tax
Total cost = $n + (20% × $n) + 5% × $n + (20% × $n)
= 1.2 × $n + 0.06 × $n
= 1.26 × $n.
Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
