OMG HELP ME PLSSSSSS!!!

1992

liq [111]

Answer:

Hello heloo it's my first question so IAm just writing any thing

4 0

3 years ago

You and three friends go to a baseball game. You each pay $2 for a drink and x dollars for nachos. Use the Distributive Property

BabaBlast [244]

Answer:

The simplified expression for the total amount the group pays is (6 + 3·x) dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

The given parameters are;

The number of friends that went to the baseball game = 3

The amount each paid for a drink = $2

The amount each paid for nachos = x dollars

Therefore, the amount each spend = $2 + x dollars

The total amount the three friends spend = 3 × ($2 + x dollars)

By distributive property is given as follows;

a × (b + c) = a × b + a × c

a × (b - c) = a × b - a × c

Given that a, b, and c are real numbers

Therefore;

The total amount the three friends spend = 3 × ($2 + x dollars) = 3 × $2 + 3 × x dollars

The total amount the three friends spend = 3 × $2 + 3 × x dollars

The simplified expression for the total amount the group pays = $(6 + 3·x) = (6 + 3·x) dollars.

4 0

2 years ago

In hear how do you see how many points do i have?

ankoles [38]

Go to your profile and you should see it

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the difference of (t-8)-(t-15)

Vsevolod [243]

I think u should try (t-23) because -8 minus - 15 is = to 23 so yeah add the t in front of it

5 0

3 years ago

The mayor of a town has proposed a plan for the construction of an adjoining bridge. A political study took a sample of 1700 vot

lara [203]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.66 -0.63}{\sqrt{\frac{0.63(1-0.63)}{1700}}}=2.562$

$p_v =P(z>2.562)=0.0052$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that at 2% of significance the proportion of voters that favored construction is higher than 0.63 or 63%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=1700 represent the random sample taken

$\hat p=0.66$ estimated proportion of voters that favored construction

$p_o=0.63$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.02$ represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that percentage of residents who favor construction is more than 63%.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.63$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.63$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.66 -0.63}{\sqrt{\frac{0.63(1-0.63)}{1700}}}=2.562$

Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.02$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>2.562)=0.0052$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that at 2% of significance the proportion of voters that favored construction is higher than 0.63 or 63%.

7 0

3 years ago