Answer:
So as I understood the question it asks you to write a draft of the letter thinking that you are the narrator.
Explanation:
-you can point out that something is clearly wrong( you can add your own ideas since you are the narrator*<em> the writer of the draft</em>*)
-You can add your own ideas ( like you found something very terrifying for example like Maggie's brother is not dead)
Answer:
The author has tried to communicate that good personal transactions cannot be teach to someone. A person can only learn how he has to manage his personal transactions. This could be by experience and observing others. A person may create personal transactions in a non fiction way by writing it from heart. The readers does not accept the content if its fake or overly fictitious.
Explanation:
The author of this article has advised people to write everything by heart and do not go for overly fictitious writing. If one tries to learn personal transactions he may result with good ends but this cannot be teach. A person can learn thing by his deeds and experience in certain situations.
That sounds deep my guy, I good