North and South Carolina became separate colonies in 1712. Each of the colonies prospered on its own affair without depending on the other. The fertility of the Low Country and several harbors facilitated the prosperity of the South.
Your answer is wrong and I have no idea why your talking about feminism. But anyway the affect of surprise was that the natives Americans enemy wouldn't have time to prepare so the losses/casualties for the enemy would be heavy,also using the element of surprise would also most likely scare enemy soldiers, and they would be distracted and confused as well.
We recommend you to make a spreadsheet with all the incomes, outcomes and insert every expense you have. Cut out the leisure item by 50%; find online discounts for your shopping list and purchase only what it's necessary. Reduce the social outings, use public transportation or carpool to the office and collect money for gas. Also, cut off credit card costs and leave it only for emergencies. Clothes and shoes purchases can be done during sale season, rather than at the beginning.
Didnt we put up fake tanks and stuff like that or maybe that was a different war
<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>
<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>
<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>
<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>
<em>Hope this helps.</em>
<em>-Northstar</em>
