Answer:
I beleive this one would be a bit of a matter of opinion when it comes down to it, but personally I would call it a bit unethical.
Explanation:
Escpecially when it comes to something like medication, it feels unethical to be advertising yourself as the only brand that will work. In my mind unique selling proposition would be focusing on what differentiates your product from others (example, my product can provide 48 hour vs other brands that only offer 24 hour) Simply stating their brand is the only solution feels unethical and does not provide ample evidence of this claim to customers in my opinion. I don't think it would be considered illegal, but in my mind its tiptoeing the line of ethics.
Answer:
Allocated MOH= $92,625
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the predetermined overhead rate:</u>
<u></u>
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 97,500 / 3,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $32.5 per direct labor hour
<u>Now, we can allocate overhead:</u>
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 32.5*2,850
Allocated MOH= $92,625
Answer:
(D) none of the choices
Explanation:
Shannon is the officer and a human, people can make mistakes, since due to the decision made by him the sales level has decreased and this was not expected by the company. Even though there is decrease but as he did not do it with the intentions to degrade company or the performance of company, he shall not be guilty of any act.
Assuming he took all the valid steps while forming the decisions he shall not be liable for any defaults or losses.
As it is common to incur losses in business, because of market changes.
Answer:
A. Compute the multifactor productivity(MFP) (labor plus equipment) under the Prior to buying the new equipment.
multi-factor productivity = 90 carts / ($60 + $50) = 0.8182 carts/$
B. Compute the % growth in productivity between the Prior and after buying the new equipment.
new multi-factor productivity = 96 carts / ($50 + $60) = 0.8727 carts/$
% growth = (0.8727 - 0.8182) / 0.8182 = 6.66% increase
C. Comment on the changes in productivity according to two measures,and which you believe in the more pertinent for this situation?
the multi-factor productivity increased by 6.66% because even though the total cost of the factors of production remained the same, total output increased by 6 units
Do you have a picture or something yes or no