Correction:
Because F is not present in the statement, instead of working onP(E)P(F) = P(E∩F), I worked on
P(E∩E') = P(E)P(E').
Answer:
The case is not always true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the odds for E equals the odds against E', then it is correct to say that the E and E' do not intersect.
And for any two mutually exclusive events, E and E',
P(E∩E') = 0
Suppose P(E) is not equal to zero, and P(E') is not equal to zero, then
P(E)P(E') cannot be equal to zero.
So
P(E)P(E') ≠ 0
This makes P(E∩E') different from P(E)P(E')
Therefore,
P(E∩E') ≠ P(E)P(E') in this case.
Total monthly income = $5300
housing = 28%
= 28%*$5300
=(28/100)*$5300
=$1484
Letter C
Answer:
X=1/5
Step-by-step explanation:
7×-2×-10=-9
5×=-9 +10
5×/5=1/5
×=1/5
It has been given in the question that Mary's team had lost 30% of the total of 20 games. There has been no ties for this team. It is required to find the number of matches that Mary's team lost.
Total number of games played = 20
Percentage of games lost by Mary's team = 30%
Number of games lost by Mary's team = (30/100) * 20
= 3 * 2
= 6
So Mary's team lost 6 games in all. I hope this is the answer you were looking for. The process is easy once you understand the words of the problem.
