I think it begins with the prosecutor...sorry if I’m wrong...:(
Answer:
Explanation:
Which of the following statements concerning “SIPs” under the Clean Air Act is false? a.) After EPA sets a NAAQS, it is up to each state to decide how to achieve the standard b.) If a state uses “tall stacks” to attain a NAAQS, it does not receive credit for the gains achieved by that method c.) If a state uses “command and control” to attain a NAAQS, it does not receive credit for the gains achieved by that method d.) Regardless of pollution levels within a state, its SIP may be inadequate if the state contributes significantly to nonattainment in another state e.) In certain circumstances, EPA may reject a state’s proposed SIP as deficient, after which EPA may promulgate a federal implementation plan
Answer:
Explanation:
The case of Max v. National Credit Co. is heard in a trial court. The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co. v. Pecan Corp. is heard in an appellate court. The difference be-tween a trial and an appellate court is whether