Then suddenly the singer threw up his face, straightened his tubby figure, rose upon his tiptoes, and with wagging head and scarlet cheeks emitted such a howl as the same dog might have given had his growl been checked by a kick from his master.
Every Greek was a trained critic, and as unsparing in his hisses as he was lavish in his applause.
Many a singer far better than this absurd fop had been driven amid execration and abuse from the platform.
<h3>Explain your answer briefly?</h3>
In these three lines, we can see that the tone is a mocking one. In the first sentence, the singer's singing is compared to a dog's howl when being kicked. This implies that the singing was not pleasant in any way. In the second sentence, the author tells us that the audience disliked the singing just as much, being "unsparing in their hisses.
Thus," Finally, we learn that the author refers to the singer as an "absurd fop."
To learn more about The Contest click here:
brainly.com/question/11968462
#SPJ1
A paradox can be seen when a character named Georgiana claims that danger is not a threat to her life.
We can arrive at this answer as follows:
- The paradox is a figure of language that presents two opposing ideas simultaneously.
- In "The Birthmark" we can see an example of this when Georgiana states that she is willing to do anything to get rid of the birthmark, even if it is a dangerous thing.
- She claims the danger is not a threat to her life.
As we know the danger is a threat to life. Affirming that life is not threatened in the presence of danger is a paradox, as it is an idea that contradicts reality.
"The Birthmark" is a story about how a birthmark can cause instability between people and personal problems.
More information:
brainly.com/question/14451527?referrer=searchResults
Your answer is false
Hope this helps!
<span>Farming on or looting the site of an Indian burial ground.</span>
The Wechsler Objective Language Dimensions (WOLD; Wechsler, 1996) is a
UK standardisation of the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-R),
developed in the United States (US). It involves the evaluation of six
elements: (1) organisation, (2) unity and coherence, (3) vocabulary, (4)
grammar and usage, (5) capitalisation and (6) punctuation. Individual
scores for each domain are computed and then collated into a total
score.
