Answer:
Churchill became a member of the parliament in the year 1990 and was a famous parliamentarian. He was a spokesperson on the common and spoke mostly about the issues related to the colonies and the colonist. His ideology was based on that of his father's who criticized his own party and his opposition also.
Such actions and ideology were supported by the other members of the parliament. His one phrase that he had nothing to offer except blood, toil and sweat was very famous and he said this when he asked for the support of house of common in his new government.
The real causes of the World War l includes the politics, secret alliances, imperialism and nationalistic pride but there was one single event the contributed which was the assassination of archdu-ke Ferdinand of Austria which started a chain of events leading to war.
<h3>What was the
World War l?</h3>
It was the war that was fought mainly in Europe and the Middle East between the Central Powers and the Allies on July 28, 1914 to November 11, 1918 with the collapse of the Central Powers.
The World War l was caused by the collective event of imperialism, Militarism, alliance system, Nationalism but there was one single event the contributed which was the assassination of archd-uke Ferdinand of Austria which started a chain of events leading to war
The aftermath of the war was led to lot of destroyed empires, creation of new nation-states and encouraged independence movements in Europe's colonies. It also forced the United States to become a world power and led directly to Soviet communism and the rise of Hitler
Read more about World War l
brainly.com/question/27233586
#SPJ1
Answer:
Native Americans were vulnerable during the colonial era because they had never been exposed to European diseases, like smallpox, so they didn’t have any immunity to the disease, as some Europeans did.
Explanation:
Answer:
What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?
Peasant farmers often depended on <em>subsistence agriculture</em> - this means that the farmers primarily grew crops to feed themselves and their families, rather than selling their crops for economic gain.
So, if the peasant farmers lose their crops, they will have nothing to eat. The peasants will probably go hungry and perhaps starve.
And what common pattern do we see when the masses are starving? They <em>revolt </em>! I suppose that's a bit of a stretch, but in general, the peasant class would definitely be upset at having no crops to feed themselves and their children. Such tensions will be directed at their leader or "King" who is supposed to be prepared for any disaster.
Wouldn't people think, "The leader has everything he wants and can get anything he does not have, can't he share with us?"
Anyways, that's how I would interpret this question.
Hope this helps!
:D
