Answer:
<em>The leader in your group determines what gets made with the wood and how much of it</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
Since there is a bountiful amount of wood resources available in the forest, we will have the luxury of utilizing the forest resources for firewood, shelter, furniture, boats, and so on. The fact that there is a bountiful supply of forest resources can lead to improper or devastating extraction of wood materials from the forest. This wrong harvesting can damage the forest. The best choice to determine what and how to use the forest is for the leader to determine how much of the necessary materials can be made with the woods, and how much of the wood can be used. This sensible utilization of the wood material will ensure that the forest is preserved as much as possible.
<span>❅ </span>It existed f<span> from the </span>end of the Napoleonic Wars to the outbreak of World War I.
<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
