Answer:
I believe the correct answer is option (B) One person sues another for damage to the vehicle from their car accident.
Explanation:
A Civil matter involves a person bringing an action against another person for a wrong committed to his person or property which results in damage. It could also involve a dispute between two or more persons over a property. In a civil matter, the person who institutes an action is called "Plaintiff(s)" while the person against whom the action is brought is known as the "Defendant(s). A civil action may arise where there is a breach of a contractual duty.
For better clarity, a person can unlawfully enter the property of another person to use or do something. Thus, the affected person can bring an action of trespass against such a person. Other examples of a Civil case are, Negligence, Child custody, Divorce, Assault/Battery, etc. It is important to note that what the plaintiff claim are reliefs, such as damages, specific performance, injunction depending on the issue. The above option involves negligence.
Answer:
before the Civil War: Most of the Southern states, before the Civil War, made it illegal to teach a slave to read and write. Now, some African Americans did learn to read and write secretly. Some... their master or mistress actually taught them to read and write
After the civil war the African American people established a new education system for students. They established new schools under the name of “ Sab bath schools”. This kind of schools took a place in the church through Sunday and the week. Their curriculum was based on religions.
<span><span> </span>Both the kings and the popes
have an extremely high amount of power. The pope has the power of the people,
for many people that lived in the middle ages were devoted to their religion,
an in this case the pope. The kings were the supreme rulers of their kingdoms.</span>
Hi c;
Feudalism as practiced in the Kingdom of England was a state of human society which was formally structured and stratified on the basis of land tenure and the varieties thereof. Society was thus ordered around relationships derived from the holding of land, which landholdings are termed "fiefdoms, fiefs, or fees".
These political and military customs existed in medieval Europe, having developed around 700 A.D., flourished up to about the first quarter of the 14th century[1] and declined until their legal abolition in England with the Tenures Abolition Act 1660.
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.